| ID | 126426 |
| Title Proper | Should i be avoided or embraced? exploring divergence between political scientist and student writing norms |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lascher, Edward L ; Melzer, Daniel |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Political science instructors commonly emphasize the importance of effective writing. However, it is unclear that students either understand or share the norms about what this entails. A notable example is the appropriate use of voice. Prior literature has shown that academic writers often believe it is appropriate to use the pronoun "I" for a variety of rhetorical purposes but suggests that students may be unaware of this reasoning. We examine this topic by determining more precisely how commonly "I" is used in a major political science journal, conducting a survey of political science undergraduate students at a large comprehensive university, and interviewing political science faculty at the same university. Although each group's attitudes are complex, we find evidence that students' views commonly conflict with disciplinary norms. We close by considering the implications for teaching about writing in political science. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.4; Oct 2013: p.802-807 |
| Journal Source | Political Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.4; Oct 2013: p.802-807 |
| Key Words | Political Science ; Academic Writers ; Undergraduate Students ; Commonly Conflict |