| ID | 126631 |
| Title Proper | Can contingency be 'internalized' into the bounds of theory? critical realism, the philosophy of internal relations and the solution of uneven and combined development |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Cooper, Luke |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Can general mechanisms governing social life (necessity) and the possibility of multiple outcomes in socio-historical processes (contingency) be incorporated into a single theoretical framework? In recent years, the critical realist philosophy of science has emerged as an intellectual strand within international relations (IR) that makes theoretical claims about necessary social processes while recognizing the irreducible role of contingency. However, critical realist scholars treat contingency as an 'externality', thereby declining to theorize social processes that result in contingent outcomes. Here, it is argued that contingency emerges out of the combination of events and processes as theorized by the law of uneven and combined development. This provides a general conceptualization that treats differentiated historical outcomes, and their contingencies, as inherent to human development. Out of these assumptions a workable approach to historical sociology in IR can be developed-one predicated upon uncovering the form of historical 'combination', the contingent fusion of elements, in international systems. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 26, No.3; Sep 2013: p.573-597 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 26, No.3; Sep 2013: p.573-597 |
| Key Words | Critical Realism ; International Relations ; Philosophy of Internal Relations ; Human Development |