Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:410Hits:19937642Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID127007
Title ProperRawls's difference principle as compensation for social immobility
LanguageENG
AuthorMachin, Dean
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Outside academia, John Rawls's theory of justice-justice as fairness-has had little impact. This article is part of a broader project to rectify this. I offer a distinctive, second-best, argument for Rawls's difference principle. The difference principle requires that inequalities in income and wealth are justified only if they benefit society's least-advantaged citizens. My paper argues that, slightly-modified, the difference principle is an excellent principle of redress in light of the UK's continued failure to give all citizens fair career chances. I show how we might realize the difference principle at the level of policy through tax rate reductions or negative tax rates. I conclude that if you don't want to accept the second-best argument for the difference principle you must get serious about giving all citizens fair career chances. As I suggest, this task is extremely difficult.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Quarterly Vol. 84, No.4; Oct-Dec 2013: p.506-514
Journal SourcePolitical Quarterly Vol. 84, No.4; Oct-Dec 2013: p.506-514
Key WordsDifference Principle ;  Social Mobility ;  Tax Credits ;  Negative Tax Rate ;  John Rawls ;  Second - Best