| ID | 127636 |
| Title Proper | Color revolutions and parliamentary democracy in Georgia and Kyrgyzstan |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Akmatalieva, Aynura |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The media of Kyrgyzstan described Georgia after the Rose Revolution of 2003 as a country that has made giant strides in economic recovery, suppressing corruption, and reform of its police and education system. The two countries increased their cooperation after the Tulip Revolution of 2010 in Kyrgyzstan; today, it has taken the form of an exchange of diplomatic and political experience and youth programs. Trade turnover between the two countries is expected to top $1.4 million.
These two Soviet successor-states, which adhere to different sociocultural and economic traditions, chose a practically identical road leading first to the presidential form of government and then to parliamentary democracies. This choice made after the color revolutions of 2003 in Georgia and 2005 and 2010 in Kyrgyzstan was suggested by the universal model of democracy that had gained popularity all over the world and was primarily a mechanism for legitimizing the power of the new people inside and outside the country. So far, parliamentary democracy in both countries has not developed enough to produce unambiguous results. It is much more important to understand how the changes were accepted and substantiated through an analysis of public discussions, discussions in the media and on the Internet, as well as in official documents, interviews, and statements by the leaders. |
| `In' analytical Note | Central Asia and the Caucasus Vol. 14, No.2; 2013: p.63-77 |
| Journal Source | Central Asia and the Caucasus Vol. 14, No.2; 2013: p.63-77 |
| Key Words | Georgia ; Kyrgyzstan ; Parliamentary Democracy ; Color Revolutions ; Rose Revolution ; Tulip Revolution ; Constitutional Reforms ; Legitimation Strategy |