| ID | 127666 |
| Title Proper | Is Nationalism intrinsically violent? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Malesevic, Sinisa |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article analyzes the complex and contradictory relationships between nationalism and organized violence. The author challenges the approaches that see nationalism as being inherently linked with violence and demonstrates that nationalist ideology by itself is rarely a main cause of hostile acts. The article focuses on the different forms of organized violence including wars, revolutions, terrorism, and genocide. It aims to show that the relationship between violence and nationalism cannot be properly captured by the dominant intentionalist, naturalist, and formativist perspectives. Instead the case is made that the emphasis should be given to the long-term historical processes and the relative modernity of both nationalism and organized violence. The author argues that it is very difficult to generate sustained and organized violent nationalist action. The mutation of nationalist doctrines into violent acts is generally a product of unintended structural circumstances and is characterized by its temporary nature and volatility. More specifically, this process is usually generated by the coercive bureaucratization, centrifugal ideologization, and their capacity to be embedded in the networks of microsolidarity. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol.19, No.1; Jan-Mar.2013: p.12-37 |
| Journal Source | Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol.19, No.1; Jan-Mar.2013: p.12-37 |
| Key Words | Relation between violence and nationalism ; Violence ; Nationalism ; Internationalism ; Naturalism ; Formativism ; Organized violence ; Nationalist ideology |