| ID | 127790 |
| Title Proper | Quality over quantity |
| Other Title Information | amici influence and judicial decision making |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Steffensmeier, Janet M. Box ; Christenson, Dino P ; Hitt, Matthew P |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Interest groups often make their preferences known on cases before the U.S. Supreme Court via amicus curiae briefs. In evaluating the case and related arguments, we posit that judges take into account more than just the number of supporters for the liberal and conservative positions. Specifically, judges' decisions may also reflect the relative power of the groups. We use network position to measure interest group power in U.S. Supreme Court cases from 1946 to 2001. We find that the effect of interest group power is minimal in times of heavily advantaged cases. However, when the two sides of a case are approximately equal in the number of briefs, such power is a valuable signal to judges. We also show that justice ideology moderates the effect of liberal interest group power. The results corroborate previous findings on the influence of amicus curiae briefs and add a nuanced understanding of the conditions under which the quality and reputation of interest groups matter, not just the quantity. |
| `In' analytical Note | American Political Science Review Vol.107, No.3; August 2013: p.446-460 |
| Journal Source | American Political Science Review Vol.107, No.3; August 2013: p.446-460 |
| Key Words | United States - US ; Supreme Court - SC ; US Supreme Court ; Decision Making ; Amici Influence ; Interest Group ; Justice Ideology ; US Judicial System ; Power Data ; Veto Power ; Amicus Curiae |