| ID | 127854 |
| Title Proper | How divergent views on nuclear disarmament threaten the NPT |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kmentt, Alexander |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) is facing several serious challenges. There are increasing doubts about its effectiveness in preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The actions of North Korea are deeply worrying and significantly undermine the NPT edifice. The complex issue of the Iranian nuclear program and if and how it can be resolved will have serious repercussions for the treaty.
Universality is a key ingredient of the NPT's credibility, but looks more and more distant. Without India, Israel, and Pakistan, which never were parties, and North Korea, which declared its withdrawal from the treaty in 2003, the NPT's value as a security and confidence-building instrument is increasingly put into question in the regional contexts of the Middle East and Asia. Arguably its most serious challenge, however, is the extent to which it can still be considered as a framework in which to achieve nuclear disarmament. Fundamentally different and even conflicting views are apparent among the NPT membership on key aspects, such as the priority of nuclear disarmament, the demands of Article VI,[1] the definition of credible progress, and the way forward. These differences threaten the integrity of the NPT. |
| `In' analytical Note | Arms Control Today Vol.43, No.10; December 2013: p.8-13 |
| Journal Source | Arms Control Today Vol.43, No.10; December 2013: p.8-13 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Weapon ; Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty - NPT ; North Korea ; Iran ; Iranian Nuclear Programme ; Nuclear Disarmament ; Israel ; Middle East ; Asia ; Nuclear Strategy ; Nuclear Proliferation ; Nuclear Conflicts ; Nuclear Insurgency ; Nuclear Threat ; International Organization - IO ; International Relations - IR |