| ID | 128228 |
| Title Proper | Counterinsurgency in El Salvador |
| Other Title Information | the lessons and limits of the indirect approach |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ucko, David H |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Following two frustrating counterinsurgency campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is a drive to find new and more viable ways of addressing irregular security challenges. In this effort, the 1980s' campaign in El Salvador has gained prominence, as it resulted in the defeat of the guerrilla adversary yet involved only a modest deployment of US personnel and resources. The use of history to search for models and precedents can be fruitful, but past conflicts must be understood on their own terms and not made to fit the preconceived ideas of the day. A deeper appreciation of what happened in El Salvador reveals not only the unique circumstances that shaped the campaign but also the limited results of the counterinsurgency program to which the war's outcome is now being ascribed. This article adopts a broader lens, focusing on the real yet undervalued factors that produced peace in El Salvador and whether the final outcome was truly quite as successful as is now commonly assumed. |
| `In' analytical Note | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol.24, No.4; October 2013: p.669-695 |
| Journal Source | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol.24, No.4; October 2013: p.669-695 |
| Key Words | Insurgency ; Counterinsurgency ; El Salvador ; Indirect Approach ; Peacebuilding ; Guerrilla Adversary ; Guerrilla War ; Iraq ; Afghanistan ; Irregular Security Challenges ; National Security ; National Policy |