| ID | 128951 |
| Title Proper | Beyond the Trinitarian institutionalization of the warrior etho |
| Other Title Information | a normative conceptualization of soldier and contractor commitment in post-modern conflict |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Krieg, Andreas |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Traditionally in liberal normative theory the warrior's ethos has been defined on basis of the warrior's raison d'être as the trinitarian protector of the social contractarian discretionary association of society and state. Since the post-modern warrior, whether serving in state uniform or as an employee of a commercial enterprise, is increasingly asked to provide security as a global rather than public good on the liberal state's behalf in non-trinitarian contingency operations, this paper provides a broader normative conceptualization of the post-modern warrior ethos. Trinitarian operations in this respect are defined as those operations that revolve around the state soldier's primary trinitarian function of providing security for society and state as a member of the Clausewitzian trinity of society, state and soldier. Instead of solely conceptualizing the warrior's ethos as a narrow trinitarian institutionalization process, this paper demonstrates that for the warrior who provides security increasingly in non-trinitarian operations, the post-modern warrior ethos becomes more and more an alternatively institutionalized characteristic of spirit beyond the social contractarian trinity. Shaping both the soldier's and the contractor's commitment in non-trinitarian contingency operations, the alternative non-trinitarian institutionalization of the warrior's ethos ensures that the post-modern warrior remains a virtuous and committed security service provider amid high operational risks even when serving the interests of common humanity rather than of his family, state and nation. |
| `In' analytical Note | Defence Studies Vol.14, No.1; March 2014: p.56-75 |
| Journal Source | Defence Studies Vol.14, No.1; March 2014: p.56-75 |
| Key Words | Trinitarian Institutionalization ; Warrior Ethos ; Post-Modern Conflict ; War ; Conflict ; Modern Conflict ; National Security ; Post-Modern Warrior ; Trinitarian Operations ; History ; War History ; Warfare History ; Contingency Operations |