Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:592Hits:20279148Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID128974
Title ProperIs China's social unrest the source of its foreign policy? a preliminary study on the impact of domestic instability on external relations
LanguageENG
AuthorYamaguchi, Shinji
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The basic question this paper asks is how the domestic instability in China will affect external action.
China's society is undergoing a major change along with its economic growth, with various social
contradictions deepening, including gaps between the rich and the poor. These social contradictions
occasionally erupted in riots and demonstrations. Scholars have argued what sorts of external action
these developments would lead to, on which there are two camps of thought: (i) expansion, and (ii)
compromises. The problem is that for what reasons and through what mechanisms the domestic
instability would lead to external actions have not yet been fully clarified. Domestic instability does
not necessarily always influence external actions in all countries. There should be some conditions
in order for domestic instability to influence external actions. This paper argues that the intervening
variable that links domestic issues to external policy is the stability of the political system. From this
perspective, the current instability of China's political system is only limited and the likelihood that
domestic problems should be diverted to its external policy is not so high at the present stage. For
the moment at least, China is not in a situation where domestic instability would lead to hard-line
external policy, as suggested by diversionary theory. That is because the extent to which domestic
problems in China can make the political system itself unstable is limited. Meanwhile, regarding
the claim that China cannot compromise on external policy under the watchful eyes of the domestic
elite or society as a whole, as suggested by audience cost theory, there is both supporting and
negating evidence at present.
`In' analytical NoteNIDS Journal of Defense and Security Vol.14; Dec 2013: p.19-34
Journal SourceNIDS Journal of Defense and Security Vol.14; Dec 2013: p.19-34
Key WordsChina ;  Economic Growth ;  Social Contradictions ;  Domestic Instability ;  External Actions ;  Political System ;  External Policy