Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1458Hits:19808183Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID129462
Title ProperPolicing the party
Other Title Informationconflicts between local prosecutors and party leaders under late Stalinism
LanguageENG
AuthorCohn, Edward D
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)During the late Stalin era, many of the USSR's local party control officials and prosecutors entered into a protracted conflict over who had the right to judge the conduct of communists; prosecutors charged that party committees were shielding communists from prosecution, while control officials claimed that party organs were deferring to prosecutors and abandoning their traditional oversight role. This article will argue that although some party committees were interfering in the courts, the dominant story of party-procuracy relations under post-war Stalinism involved the disengagement of party organs from the oversight of administrative wrongdoing, with long-lasting consequences for the Soviet regime's attitude toward corruption.
`In' analytical NoteEurope-Asia Studies Vol.65, No.10; December 2013: p.1912-1930
Journal SourceEurope-Asia Studies Vol.65, No.10; December 2013: p.1912-1930
Key WordsCorruption ;  Political Conflicts ;  Political Agenda ;  Political Policies ;  Russia ;  Soviet Regime ;  Stalinism ;  Local Political Conflicts - Russia ;  Communist Regime