| ID | 129547 |
| Title Proper | Nuclear South Korea? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ahn, Mun Suk ; Cho, Young Chul |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | After North Korea's third nuclear test in February 2013, South Koreans are once again debating whether to go nuclear. Some advocates of South Korean nuclear possession argue that nuclear weapons are necessary for self-defence against the nuclear-armed North. Some support South Korea's nuclearization as leverage vis-à-vis North Korea and China. Some argue that going nuclear will heighten the South's national prestige. However, others counter that South Korea's nuclearization is not desirable and, indeed, barely feasible. First, since North-South conflicts have not diminished since the 1953 truce, the nuclear armament of the two Koreas could result in a nuclear war. Second, the South's nuclearization would only hasten North Korea's ardent pursuit of securing and increasing its stock of nuclear warheads. Third, it would prompt a fierce arms race in Northeast Asia by pressing Japan and Taiwan to go nuclear. Finally, it would undermine Seoul's close ties with Washington. In order to maintain a nuclear-free South Korea, the US needs to reinforce its nuclear umbrella and eradicate the North Korean nuclear threat through active and comprehensive negotiations with Pyongyang. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Journal Vol.69, No.1; March 2014: p.26-34 |
| Journal Source | International Journal Vol.69, No.1; March 2014: p.26-34 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Armament ; Nuclear War ; Arms Race ; Nuclear Umbrella ; Nuclear Threat ; Leverage ; National Prestige ; Active and Comprehensive Negotiations ; North Korea ; South Korea ; United States ; Nuclear Arsenal ; Nuclear Disarmament |