Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1449Hits:19406522Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID129636
Title ProperClimate change and EU-China partnership
Other Title Informationrealist disguise or institutionalist blessing?
LanguageENG
AuthorMen, Jing
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Both the EU and China are important participants in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. The EU's reliance on legally binding rules and institutions demonstrates its strong belief on institutionalism. While interstate cooperation is certainly necessary, implementation of any international agreement and most of the work needs to be done within a state. Henceforth, an uneasy balance between national interests and international responsibility has to be maintained. In the case of EU-China partnership, the carbon aviation tax issue serves as a good example to examine the realist-institutionalist struggle. Although it is still too early to tell if the EU and China would overcome their major disagreements in the field of climate change, there is reason to believe that an international agreement may be reached by 2015.
`In' analytical NoteAsia Europe Journal Vol.12, No.1-2; March 2014: p.49-62
Journal SourceAsia Europe Journal Vol.12, No.1-2; March 2014: p.49-62
Key WordsEurope ;  European Union - EU ;  China ;  EU- China Relations ;  EU- China Policy ;  EU-China Partnership ;  Kyoto Protocol ;  National Interests ;  International Responsibility ;  Climate Change ;  Carbon Aviation ;  International Agreement ;  Environmental Security ;  Institutionalism ;  Interstate Cooperation ;  Environmental Strategy


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text