Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1087Hits:19617404Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID130066
Title ProperIt's time for a sea control frigate
LanguageENG
AuthorHowitt, Zachary
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)A vessel based on the national security cutter could offer significant benefits to the Navy.
W hile O liver Hazard Perry- class frigates are not the only platforms you would want for a serious confrontation, they are great independent-deployers and effective at a multitude of missions such as escort operations and antisubmarine warfare (ASW). As the Navy decommissions the last 15 frigates, soon to be joined by 21 Ticonderoga- class cruisers, we will call on our existing hulls to support their ongoing missions. There is little doubt the littoral combat ship (LCS) fills some of this void, but even the top brass seem to agree that it's ineffective in a high-endurance, blue-water setting.
In January, a report from the Pentagon described a plan to cut the amount of LCSs from 52 to 32 ships, and in a leaked classified memo, Commander of Naval Surface Forces Vice Admiral Tom Copeman called for a new type of multi-mission ship. 1 Many envision a new combatant ship that incorporates air- and missile- defense radar and an electromagnetic railgun. While it is imperative that the Navy build these types of ships, a multibillion-dollar warship juggernaut is simply unnecessary when a new, cost-effective frigate could effectively accomplish the same missions.
Of the many potential frigate designs, Huntington Ingalls Industries offers one derived from its successful national security cutter (NSC) hull dubbed the "patrol frigate," originally intended and modeled for international navies. At first, it may seem preposterous to paint a Coast Guard cutter gray and call it a warship. In the July 2013 issue of Proceedings , Norman Polar opined that more frigates were needed, but was quick to dismiss a patrol frigate as a viable option. He claimed it "lacked growth potential and service life, as well as certain military features." 2 But tweaking the NSC could turn it into a viable candidate that meets the Navy's needs.
`In' analytical NoteUS Naval Institute Proceedings Vol.140, No.4; April 2014: p.62-67
Journal SourceUS Naval Institute Proceedings Vol.140, No.4; April 2014: p.62-67
Key WordsNational Security Cutter - NSC ;  Coast Guard Cutter - CGC ;  Antisubmarine Warfare - ASW ;  Littoral Combat Ship - LCS ;  Patrol Frigate ;  Patrol Vessels ;  Maritime Conflicts ;  Maritime Policy ;  Maritime Security ;  Maritime Strategy ;  Maritime Capabilities ;  Naval Operations ;  Naval Needs ;  Sea-Control Frigate Transformation - SCFT ;  Patrol Frigate Baseline - PFB