| ID | 130471 |
| Title Proper | Near eastern promises |
| Other Title Information | why Washington should focus on the Middle East |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pollack, Kenneth M ; Takeyh, Ray |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Contrary to popular myths and conspiracy theories about Washington's desire to control the Middle East, for the past six decades, U.S. policymakers have usually sought to minimize the United States' involvement there. But the high-stakes nature of American interests in the region -- particularly oil -- and the complexity of the Middle East's problems always seem to draw the United States back in. In spite of himself, U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower was sucked into the Suez crisis in 1956 and the pan-Arabist revolts of the late 1950s. Lyndon Johnson barely lifted a finger to prevent the Six-Day War in 1967. Richard Nixon found himself grudgingly drawn into the region by the 1973 Arab-Israeli war and the superpower nuclear crisis it caused. Despite his aggressive image, Ronald Reagan did little in response to repeated attacks in Lebanon and the Persian Gulf by Iran and its proxies. George H. W. Bush came to office hoping to ignore Saddam Hussein, not to go to war with him. And although it is rarely remembered today, George W. Bush was not particularly interested in the Middle East and paid little attention to the region prior to the 9/11 attacks. |
| `In' analytical Note | Foreign Affairs Vol.93, No.3; May-June2014: p.92-105 |
| Journal Source | Foreign Affairs Vol.93, No.3; May-June2014: p.92-105 |
| Key Words | Middle East ; United States - US ; Foreign Policy ; US Foreign Policy ; Militant Attack ; Terrorist Organization ; Super Power ; Nuclear Crisis ; Suez Crisis ; Arab-Israeli War ; Lebanon ; Persian Gulf ; Iran ; Middle East Policy ; Iraq ; Saddam Hussein ; 9/11 Attack |