Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1537Hits:19754188Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID130591
Title ProperFreedom and subordination
Other Title Informationdisciplinary problems in the U.S. Army during the War of 1812
LanguageENG
AuthorStagg, J. C. A
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This essay examines the general court martial case files for enlisted men in the War of 1812. The defendants were a reasonably representative cross section of the enlisted men, desertion was the most frequent offense, and mistreatment by officers was the most common motive for deserting. Most defendants proclaimed their innocence, but guilt and conviction were invariably the outcome in their trials. Officers struggled to find effective punishments. The abolition of corporal punishment by the lash in 1812 reduced the army's disciplinary options, resulting in an increasing recourse to the death penalty. The army, however, shrank from executing all the condemned.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Military History Vol;.8, No.2; April 2014: p.537-574
Journal SourceJournal of Military History Vol;.8, No.2; April 2014: p.537-574
Key WordsMilitary History ;  War ;  War History ;  History - 18th Century ;  United States ;  US Army ;  Disciplinary Problems ;  Disciplinary Options ;  Subordination ;  Freedom