| ID | 130869 |
| Title Proper | Resilience and the future balance of power |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jaishankar, Dhruva |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | There is more to power than the traditional indicators of resources, influence and perception. Not long ago - in the 1980s, in fact - the US policy community was in the throes of a high-stakes debate about the nature and extent of Soviet power. On one side was a large group who believed that the United States was losing ground to an increasingly powerful and aggressive Soviet Union. Proponents of this view pointed to the shifting balance of conventional military power in favour of Moscow, particularly in Europe, and to Soviet aggression in places such as Afghanistan. As a consequence, many American policymakers advocated increases in military spending to balance against the Soviet Union, a position that was also supported by many in the US military establishment. Others who shared this perspective proposed a more conciliatory and accommodating approach towards their rival, one that was helped along by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev's move towards glasnost, and which was eventually manifested in arms-control talks between Washington and Moscow. |
| `In' analytical Note | Survival : the IISS Quarterly Vol.56, No.3; June-July2014: p.217-232 |
| Journal Source | Survival : the IISS Quarterly Vol.56, No.3; June-July2014: p.217-232 |
| Key Words | Emerging Nations ; Emerging Powers ; Rising Powers ; United State - US ; Russia ; European Union - EU ; United Kingdom - UK ; US Foreign Policy ; India - China Relations ; Bilateral Relations ; China ; India ; Governance ; Development ; Political Risk ; Risk Analysis ; International Alliance ; International Cooperation - IC ; International Organization - IO ; International Relations - IR ; International Order |