| ID | 130944 |
| Title Proper | Better the Devil |
| Other Title Information | a response to Gus O'Donnell's 'better government' |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Berry, Craig ; Berry, Richard |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Gus O'Donnell's vision of 'better government' is presented as a critique of party politics, most specifically the short-termism, selfishness and incompetence of elected politicians. There are few people better placed than O'Donnell to form such judgements. However, O'Donnell goes much further, by calling into question the legitimacy of the democratic system which gives rise to party politics. His article outlines several mechanisms by which the exercise of power by elected ministers could be constrained by a managerialist accountability framework, without addressing the question of who determines the appropriate framework for ministerial performance. The House of Commons is condemned as 'too politicised'. O'Donnell also offers substantial praise for apparently 'depoliticised' policy-making processes, overlooking the inherently political constitution of such processes. In doing so, O'Donnell claims to be challenging party politics on behalf of voters/taxpayers, but instead seeks to dismantle any possibility of the public expressing a collective will via the ballot box that might challenge the immutability of the market economy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Quarterly Vol.85, No.1; January-March 2014: p.11-16 |
| Journal Source | Political Quarterly Vol.85, No.1; January-March 2014: p.11-16 |
| Key Words | Gus O'Donnell's Vision ; Gus O'Donnell ; Political Vision ; Economic Vision ; Democracy ; Better Government ; Legitimacy ; Political Accountability ; Political Mechanism ; Market Economy ; Political Constitution ; Inherently Political Constitution - IPC ; Democratic System |