| ID | 130949 |
| Title Proper | Respect for law and sausages |
| Other Title Information | how parliament made section 31 of the growth and infrastructure act 2013 on the sale of employment rights |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pannick, Lord Q C |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The Parliamentary debates on the clause which became section 31 of the Growth and Enterprise Act 2013 (allowing employees to agree to sign away employment rights for shares in the employing company) show that scrutiny by the House of Commons is very poor, and that scrutiny by the House of Lords is intense and very well-informed. If the Government loses the argument on a Bill in the House of Lords, it will lose the vote. However, during Parliamentary ping-pong (the back-and-forth process of amendment of a Bill between the two Houses) the Commons, and the Government, will normally get their way, however weak the policy proposal, provided that concessions on detail are made, unless the issue is regarded by the Lords as one of fundamental principle. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Quarterly Vol.85, No.1; January-March 2014: p.43-49 |
| Journal Source | Political Quarterly Vol.85, No.1; January-March 2014: p.43-49 |
| Key Words | Human Rights ; Employment ; Economic Development ; Economic Growth ; Infrastructure Development ; Social Welfare ; Parliament ; Law ; Democracy ; Politics ; Policies ; Public Policies ; Legislation ; Security |