| ID | 130992 |
| Title Proper | Data protection, with love |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bellanova, Rocco |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | How to Engage with the Politics of Privacy in the Age of Preemptive Security? My suggestion is to start with data protection, which, following De Hert and Gutwirth (2006), is not exactly the same of privacy. Extrapolating from their analysis of the two as different "legal tools," I would say that privacy and data protection are two slightly different rationales of power relations: one of privacy based on the "opacity of the individual" and one of data protection on the "transparency and accountability of the powerful" (Gutwirth and De Hert 2008:275; emphasis in original).1 These rationales (attempt to) orientate two different loose dispositifs, each formed by a composite ensemble of elements. Some of these elements are peculiar to each dispositif, while others are shared or encompassed by both |
| `In' analytical Note | International Political Sociology Vol.8, No.1, March 2014: p.112-115 |
| Journal Source | International Political Sociology Vol.8, No.1, March 2014: p.112-115 |
| Key Words | Security ; United States - US ; Privacy ; Countervailing Forces ; Data Protection ; Surveillance Programs ; Political Role ; Security Policy ; Strategy ; European Union - EU ; Area of Freedom, Security and Justice - AFSJ ; Freedom ; Justice ; Transparency and Accountability ; Power Relations ; Legal Tools ; Cyber Security |