Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:453Hits:19937344Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID131405
Title ProperNechto eroticheskoe', 'courir après l'ombre'? - logistical imperatives and the fall of Tashkent, 1859-1865
LanguageENG
AuthorMorrison, Alexander
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article explores the debates that preceded the Russian conquest of Tashkent in 1865. It argues that none of the explanations usually given for this - the 'men on the spot', 'cotton hunger', or the Great Game with Britain - is satisfactory. Instead, it shows that the War Ministry and the governors of Orenburg had advocated the capture of Tashkent from the late 1850s, and that General Cherniaev's assault in 1865 was at least tacitly authorized. The motives for the Russian advance combined the need for better supply chains to the steppe fortresses, a desire to 'anchor' their new frontier in a region with a sedentary population, and concern for security from attacks by the Khoqand Khanate. Economic considerations and rivalry with Britain played very minor roles.
`In' analytical NoteCentral Asian Survey Vol. 33, No.2; Jun 2014: p.153-169
Journal SourceCentral Asian Survey Vol. 33, No.2; Jun 2014: p.153-169
Key WordsTashkent ;  Steppe ;  Khoqand ;  Imperialism ;  Cherniaev ;  Miliutin ;  Orenburg ;  Omsk


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text