| ID | 131470 |
| Title Proper | Critics gone wild |
| Other Title Information | counterinsurgency as the root of all evil |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ucko, David H |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The Western interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan have produced a heated polemic concerning the merits and demerits of counterinsurgency - the operational approach underpinning both campaigns. The two books reviewed here provide a good summation of the arguments against counterinsurgency: it is not a strategy and will fail when mistaken as such; its theory does not make intervention and war significantly easier; and even the most successful counterinsurgency campaigns have been bloody, violent, and protracted. Yet as this review highlights, beyond these central points, criticism of counterinsurgency is too often off the mark in its approach and totalizing in its pretentions. There is much to criticize and an urgent need to learn from past campaigns, yet bold claims and broad generalizations can mislead rather than enlighten. The analysis is particularly unhelpful when the definition of the central issue at hand - counterinsurgency - is being unwittingly or deliberately distorted. In the end, these two books form a poor basis for the debate that must now take place, because they are too ideological in tone, too undisciplined in approach, and therefore too unqualified in what they finally say. |
| `In' analytical Note | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol.25, No.1; February 2014: p.161-179 |
| Journal Source | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol.25, No.1; February 2014: p.161-179 |
| Key Words | Abizaid ; Afghanistan ; Briggs Plan ; Counterinsurgency ; David Galula ; David Petraeus FM 3\-24 ; Gian Gentile ; Muqtada ; Al-Sadr ; Douglas Porch ; Gerald Templer ; Iraq ; Militant Groups ; Ethnic Groups ; Terrorism Organization ; Bloody Violence ; Strategy ; Western Interventions |