Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1537Hits:19755816Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID131498
Title ProperInformation and self-enforcing democracy
Other Title Informationthe role of international election observation
LanguageENG
AuthorHyde, Susan D ;  Marinov, Nikolay
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article argues that when democracy is not yet institutionalized, leaders have little incentive to push for clean elections, in part because they are likely to face accusations of fraud from domestic opposition groups regardless of their true behavior. Reputable international election observers can facilitate self-enforcing democracy by providing credible information about the quality of elections, thus increasing citizens' ability to coordinate against the regime when election fraud occurs, and discrediting "sore loser" protests. Patterns of postelection protests are consistent with the argument, including that postelection protests are more likely and last longer following negative reports from international observers. International election observers help promote democracy by making postelection protest more accurate in the short term, thereby increasing incentives for leaders to hold democratic elections in the long term.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Organization Vol.68, No.2; Spring 2014: p.329-359
Journal SourceInternational Organization Vol.68, No.2; Spring 2014: p.329-359
Key WordsDemocracy ;  Election ;  International Election Observation - IEO ;  Enforcing Democracy ;  Promote Democracy ;  Postelection Protest ;  International Coordination ;  International Regime ;  Sore Loser ;  Protests ;  International Observers ;  Democratic Elections ;  Fund Accusations ;  Leadership ;  Politics


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text