| ID | 131533 |
| Title Proper | Research transparency and data archiving for experiments |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | McDermott, Rose |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Although still more common in medical studies and some other areas of social science such as psychology and behavioral economics, experimental work has become an increasingly important methodology in political science. Experimental work differs from other kinds of research because it systematically administers a specific treatment to part of a population while withholding that manipulation from the rest of a subject pool. The best studies strive to keep all other aspects of the experiment similar, so that any emergent difference between the treatment and control group that emerge provide unparalleled traction in determining causal inference. Many other valuable forms of social research use observation of the natural world, rather than depending on intervention to advance understanding. Because experimentalists can create the environment or process they want to study, this strategy of intervention and manipulation constitutes the main distinction between experimental work and other forms of social observation. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Science and Politics Vol. 47, No.1; Jan 2014: p.67-71 |
| Journal Source | Political Science and Politics Vol. 47, No.1; Jan 2014: p.67-71 |
| Key Words | Research Transparency ; Data Archiving ; Experimental Work ; Natural World ; Social Observation |