| ID | 131553 |
| Title Proper | Smoke, but no fire? in Social Science, focus on the most distinct part |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pieczara, Kamila ; Eun, Yong-Soo |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Causality in social science is hard to establish even through the finest comparative research. To ease the task of extracting causes from comparisons, we present the benefits of tracing particularities in any phenomenon under investigation. We introduce three real-world examples from 2011: British riots, worldwide anticapitalist protests, and the highway crash near Taunton in southwestern England. Whereas all of these three examples have broad causes, we embark on the quest after specific factors. The Taunton accident can send a powerful message to social scientists, which is about the danger of making general statements in their explanations. Instead of saying much but explaining little, the merit of singling out the specific is substantial. As social scientists, when we are faced with "smoke" but no "fire," let us then focus on the part that is distinct. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Science and Politics Vol. 47, No.1; Jan 2014: p.145-148 |
| Journal Source | Political Science and Politics Vol. 47, No.1; Jan 2014: p.145-148 |
| Key Words | Social Science ; Causality ; British Riots ; Taunton Accident ; Social Scientists |