Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:600Hits:20304248Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID131707
Title ProperTurn toward experimentalism
Other Title Informationrethinking security and governance in the twenty-first century
LanguageENG
AuthorNance, Mark T ;  Cottrell, M Patrick
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Conventional understandings of security cooperation are rooted in the state-centric and materialist assumptions dominant in the Cold War and subscribe to the dictum of the Reagan years, 'trust but verify'. In today's more complex setting, however, governance arrangements with the most potential to address constantly mutating security threats, such as the concern over nuclear terrorism, may not be those solely designed to ensure compliance, but rather those that are better equipped to identify and solve new problems. This article draws on a burgeoning literature on 'new' or 'experimental' governance and advances an analytical framework to consider the extent to which states and other actors might be turning toward an alternative set of mechanisms that rely more heavily on non-binding standards and recommendations, peer review, increased participation, and experimentation to generate new knowledge about the challenges they face, even in the 'hard' case of security cooperation. It then explores this potential reorientation in two separate, but complementary cases that have emerged as key tools in preventing illicit nuclear proliferation: the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF), which seeks to bolster states' counter-financing of terrorism systems, and the UNSC Resolution 1540 Committee, which guides efforts to fill the governance gaps in the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Although both cases on paper contain more traditional enforcement components, in practice they rely increasingly on experimental governance. The article concludes with an evaluation of the promise and limits of an experimentalist framework in understanding the evolution of governance arrangements in response to a more complex security environment and suggests potential avenues for future research.
`In' analytical NoteReview of International Studies Vol.40, No.2; April 2014: p.277-301
Journal SourceReview of International Studies Vol.40, No.2; April 2014: p.277-301
Key WordsRethinking Security ;  Governance ;  Experimentalism ;  Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering - FATF ;  Security Cooperation ;  Cold War ;  Security Threat ;  Nuclear Terrorism ;  Materialist Assumptions ;  Analytical Agenda ;  Preventing Illicit ;  Potential Reorientation ;  Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime ;  Financial Action ;  Nuclear Proliferation ;  Counter-Financing ;  Terrorism Systems ;  Traditional Enforcement Components - TEC ;  Complex Security Environment ;  Nuclear Mechanism ;  UNSCR - 1540


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text