Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1184Hits:19565460Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID131787
Title ProperPost-Rose revolution reforms as a case of misguided policy transfer and accidental democratisation?
LanguageENG
AuthorDobbins, Michael
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article traces political and institutional developments in the Republic of Georgia after the Rose Revolution. Particular focus is placed on efforts by Georgian policy-makers to align Georgian political institutions with Western models. Drawing on the concept of policy transfer, the author demonstrates various pitfalls in this process. Based on the gathered evidence, it appears that Georgian policy-makers engaged in various processes of 'incomplete transfer', compounded by a lack of understanding or deliberately false conceptions of Western institutions. Despite democratic rhetoric and interlinkages with the West, Georgia moved to a novel form of 'hyper-presidentialism' and dismantled institutional checks and balances. Hence, the Rose Revolution initially served to reinforce the already existing institutions of 'patronal presidentialism' through a series of misguided institutional modifications. The author also discusses the outcome of the recent parliamentary and presidential elections, which may have ironically and accidentally further democratised the country.
`In' analytical NoteEurope-Asia Studies Vol.66, No.5; July 2014: p.759-774
Journal SourceEurope-Asia Studies Vol.66, No.5; July 2014: p.759-774
Key WordsSocial Reforms ;  Post-Rose Revolution ;  Post Soviet Space ;  Misguide Policy ;  Russia ;  Political Reforms ;  Democracy ;  Policy Transfer ;  Central Asia ;  Eurasia ;  Georgia ;  Elections ;  Western Models ;  Political Engagement ;  Political Revolution