| ID | 132049 |
| Title Proper | Negotiated peace versus victor's peace |
| Other Title Information | the geopolitics of peace and conflict in Sri Lanka |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Fernando, Jude Lal |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In examining the failure of the 2002 peace process between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), this essay argues for the need to go beyond the power dynamics of the local actors. The peace process was dismantled and military victory by the Sri Lankan government made possible not so much by the Sinhala nationalist discourse, which opposed administration of development aid by the LTTE, as by the global security discourse associated with geo-strategic interests. The EU-led development discourse, which was informed by the liberal internationalist ethos, could have facilitated resolution and transformation of the conflict. In its place a security-based, realist discourse was prioritized in South Asia by the UK and US governments, particularly after the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. This was the discourse which provided the material basis for the Sinhala nationalists to consolidate their power in pursuing a military victory. The post-war era is marked by geopoliticization of the human rights discourse, deepening the conflict. This essay explores the correlation between the liberal peace model, human rights, international relations and geopolitics. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 27, No.2; Jun 2014: p.206-225 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 27, No.2; Jun 2014: p.206-225 |
| Key Words | Sri Lanka ; LTTE ; South Asia ; Sinhala Nationalists ; Human Rights ; International Relations ; Geopolitics |