| ID | 132431 |
| Title Proper | OSINT |
| Other Title Information | a "grey zone"? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hribar, Gašper ; Podbregar, Iztok ; Ivanuša, Teodora |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) is generally seen in positive terms, particularly as a method of conventional intelligence collection that does not violate human rights. Of all the data collection methods, OSINT is, arguably, the only fully legal method. It can be conducted anytime, anywhere, and with any (legal) tools/software, as long as it does not violate human rights. In principle, however, OSINT does not and should not violate human rights, therefore such tools are all, again arguably, legal. Thus, its legality makes OSINT globally available, including to markets around the world. The free market offers various legal tools that facilitate the analytical procedures of data acquisition and analysis, and which no longer represent a major technical and logistical obstacle. Hypothetically, OSINT can be carried out by anyone with such specific tools and knowledge. These tools can be obtained by anyone free of charge or by paying for the licensed program, while the knowledge necessary to conduct OSINT is relatively easily acquired. Even though the tools and knowledge are freely accessible, the major difference between basic and excellent OSINT "operations" lies in the analytical process. Only experts with good analytical skills and knowledge manage to provide the right information at the right time to their customers/policymakers. OSINT is also a formal tool and means of analytical support in the work of intelligence services. Intelligence service analysts are capable of the advanced use of OSINT-they are familiar with specialized sources of specific data, advanced techniques of acquiring data, and the analytical steps needed for successful processing, exploitation, and analysis of massive amounts of data. The exploitation of special sources and the use of advanced techniques make OSINT questionable when seen through the prism of legality. The exploitation is at times semi-legal or even, arguably, illegal. The use of "special" techniques in OSINT can therefore lie on the edge between the legal and the illegal. These actions are sometimes clearly illegal, of course, and therefore forbidden by the criminal law; such practice by the intelligence services is not sanctioned. This raises the following questions: Could the intelligence services using OSINT in a legal manner to serve their specific individual interests interfere in another country on the ground of this same legality? Without this hypothetical "grey zone" would they be acting illegally and so become subject to counterintelligence observation? |
| `In' analytical Note | International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Vol.27, No.3; Fall 2014: p.529-549 |
| Journal Source | International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Vol.27, No.3; Fall 2014: p.529-549 |
| Key Words | Open Source Intelligence - OSINT ; Human Right ; Human Right Violence ; Human Right Watch ; Conventional Intelligence ; Logistical Obstacle ; Analytical Process ; Analytical Support ; Intelligence Services ; Counterintelligence Observation ; Intelligence Collection ; Human Intelligence - HUMINT ; Cultural Intelligence - CULTINT ; Geospatial Intelligence GEOINT ; Market Intelligence - MARKINT ; Imagery Intelligence IMINT ; Signals Intelligence - SIGINT ; Technical Intelligence - TECHINT ; Measurement and Signature Intelligence - MASINT |