ID | 132476 |
Title Proper | Coercion and air power |
Language | ENG |
Author | Bahadur, Manmohan |
Publication | 2014. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Coercion has been the subject of many a study. To coerce an adversary's thought process and actions to one's own advantage is its end game. Paradoxically, there needs to be a con?uence of interests for discord to occur.' Coercion is not necessarily of the military kind only; in fact, a host of other measures constitute many permutations of actions that can be used to coerce an adversary's decision-making calculus. The North "Vietnamese took on the American military might in their unification effort, and movements and groups like Hamas and Hezbollah periodically fight the Israelis despite the military asymmetry that exists between the two; and the indigenous Afghans, in the long run, were not overawed, first by the might of the Soviet Union and then the Americans. In fact, one study suggests that the initiation of approximately 30 percent of conflicts has been done by the weaker party? Why does this happen and where does air power fit in the equation? |
`In' analytical Note | Air Power Vol.9, No.2; Summer (April-June) 2014: p.1-32 |
Journal Source | Air Power Vol.9, No.2; Summer (April-June) 2014: p.1-32 |
Key Words | Coercion ; Air Power ; Military Operations ; Indigenous Afghans ; Israelis Despite ; Military Asymmetry ; Global Terrorism ; War on Terror ; Hamas ; Hezbollah ; US Troops ; Conflicts ; Soviet Union ; United States - US ; Vietnamese War |