Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1419Hits:19670420Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID132564
Title ProperInvestigation of national policy shifts to impact orbital debris environments
LanguageENG
AuthorPercya, Thomas K ;  Landruma, D. Brian
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Low earth orbit has become increasingly congested as the satellite population has grown over the past few decades, making orbital debris a major concern for the operational stability of space assets. This congestion was highlighted by the collision of the Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 satellites in 2009. This paper addresses the current state of orbital debris regulation in the United States and asks what might be done through policy change to mitigate risks in the orbital debris environment. A brief discussion of the nature of orbital debris addresses the major contributing factors including size classes, locations of population concentrations, projected satellite populations, and current challenges presented in using post-mission active debris removal to mitigate orbital debris. An overview of the current orbital debris regulatory structure of the United States reveals the fragmented nature of having six regulating bodies providing varying levels of oversight to their markets. A closer look into the regulatory policy of these agencies shows that, while they all take direction from The U.S. Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices, this policy is a guideline with no real penalty for non-compliance. Various policy solutions to the orbital debris problem are presented, ranging from a business as usual approach to a consolidated regulation system which would encourage spacecraft operator compliance. The positive aspects of these options are presented as themes that would comprise an effective policy shift towards successful LEO conservation. Potential economic and physical limitations to this policy approach are also addressed.
`In' analytical NoteSpace Policy Vol.30, No.1; Feb.2014: p.23-33
Journal SourceSpace Policy Vol.30, No.1; Feb.2014: p.23-33
Key WordsNational Policy ;  Policy Shift ;  Orbital Environments ;  Orbital Debris ;  Space Policy ;  Satellite ;  Post Mission Disposal ;  United States ;  Collision ;  Space Assets ;  LEO ;  Regularity Policy ;  Mitigate Risks