| ID | 132753 |
| Title Proper | Justice for the masses |
| Other Title Information | aggregate litigation & its alternatives |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hensler, Deborah R |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Traditionally, disputes over injury compensation that were brought to court involved one or a few plaintiffs and defendants and were processed individually. The risk and expense of such litigation meant that most victims of legally cognizable injuries never came through the courthouse doors. The modern global economy, however, has vastly increased the potential for mass harms and losses, and modern mass media have created felicitous circumstances for mass claiming. Aggregated mass litigation blasts open the courthouse doors for individuals who might otherwise find them closed. Aggregation benefits some but disadvantages others. Class action rules attempt to mitigate these conflicts, but such procedures do not apply to aggregate non-class litigation. It is time for courts to adopt rules and practices that recognize the realities of such litigation. |
| `In' analytical Note | Daedalus Vol.143, No.3; Sum.2014: p.73-82 |
| Journal Source | Daedalus Vol.143, No.3; Sum.2014: p.73-82 |
| Key Words | Dispute ; Law ; Justice ; Civil Law ; Modern Mass Media - MMM ; Litigation ; Aggregate Litigation ; Global Economy ; Mitigate ; Conflicts |