Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:765Hits:20043484Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID132776
Title ProperResource allocation and the performance of Taiwan's democratic progressive party in mixed-member majoritarian elections
LanguageENG
AuthorLin, Jih-wen
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Politics always involves the exchange of resources for votes, but the mechanism differs according to the electoral institution. The principal-agent model identifies two necessary conditions for this exchange to be feasible: (1) the opportunity cost of preferential grants is small, and (2) agents receiving these resources play a vital role in helping the principal to win. These conditions were satisfied in the presidential election of 2004, when swing voters were critical in helping the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to retain the presidency and limited costs were attached to the resources demanded by legislators elected under the single non-transferable vole (SNTV) system. After 2004, the president no longer exchanged grants for votes at the national level because swing voters could hardly change the result of presidential elections while the opportunity cost of grants was raised by the plurality-tier of the mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) system. Nevertheless, resource allocation still dominates local politics. After MMM was introduced, DPP legislators elected in DPP-led regions distributed the resources that were helpful to consolidating potential supporters; those campaigning in KMT-administered areas, however, attempted to lure swing voters by providing them with extra services-just like what their local heads did.
`In' analytical NoteIssues and Studies Vol.50, No.2; June 2014: p.1-38
Journal SourceIssues and Studies Vol.50, No.2; June 2014: p.1-38
Key WordsAsian Politics ;  Taiwan ;  Democracy ;  Single Non-Transferable Vole ;  Mixed-Member Majoritarian ;  SNTV System ;  MMM System ;  Local Politics ;  Democratic Progressive ;  Majoritarian Elections ;  Resource Allocation