| ID | 132918 |
| Title Proper | Methodological process ethics in international theory |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Curley, Tyler M |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In this review essay, I identify a commonality between Patrick Thaddeus Jackson's The Conduct of Inquiry and Daniel J. Levine's Recovering International Relations: an ethical methodological process to organize international theories in ways that promote a plurality of visions. Jackson's ideal-typification of the various methodological approaches in international relations encourages a pluralistic science. Likewise, Levine's constellation method demands a multiplicity of theoretical perspectives, in order to sustain the critical elements intrinsic to each. As I argue, this shared methodological process ethic not only advances theoretical pluralism but, in so doing, actively opens thinking space for constructing alternative political realities. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Relations Vol.28, No.2; Jun.2014: p.228-238 |
| Journal Source | International Relations Vol.28, No.2; Jun.2014: p.228-238 |
| Key Words | International Theory ; Methodology ; Pluralism ; International Arbitration ; Foreign Policy ; International Organization - IO ; International Relations - IR ; International Politics - IP ; International Community - IC |