| ID | 133076 |
| Title Proper | Your boss, players, and sponsor |
| Other Title Information | the three witches of war gaming |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Martin, Stephen Downes |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In national-security war gaming there are three classes of senior stakeholders whom I call "the three witches"-critical to the success of a game but with the power to affect negatively its quality. These comprise, first, the war-game director's superior and chain of command; second, the senior players within each game cell; and third, the sponsor of the game and that officer's chain of command. Each of these three stakeholders frequently attempts to influence the design of the war game, even during play itself. For two reasons, such attempts amount to inappropriate interference. First, these stakeholders are not (usually) expert in war-game research, design, development, or production. Second, it is a conflict of interest for them to influence the game's design; such interference puts the credibility of the results into justifiable doubt. The director, responsible for delivering a quality game, must manage these three stakeholders throughout design, play, analysis, and postevent reporting to ensure that the game meets the sponsor's national-security-related objectives. Failure to do so puts the war-game director at risk of following the three witches to a fate analogous to Macbeth's. |
| `In' analytical Note | Naval War College Review Vol.67, No.1; Win.2014: p.31-42 |
| Journal Source | Naval War College Review Vol.67, No.1; Win.2014: p.31-42 |
| Key Words | National-Security War ; War-Game ; Chain Command ; Inappropriate Interference ; Conflict ; Political Interest ; Influence ; Quality Game |