Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1528Hits:19141653Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID133278
Title ProperInternational negotiations in the shadow of national elections
LanguageENG
AuthorRickard, Stephanie J ;  Caraway, Teri L
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This study examines the role elections play in negotiations between states and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Although loans made by the IMF often require countries to introduce painful austerity measures that provoke a backlash from angry citizens, some governments are able to negotiate more favorable terms than others. Original data on the substantive content of IMF loans show that governments leverage imminent elections to obtain more lenient loan terms. Conditions that require labor market reforms in exchange for IMF financing are relatively less stringent in loans negotiated within six months before a pending democratic election, all else equal. The further away elections are from loan negotiations, the more stringent the labor conditions included in countries' loan programs. Elections give governments leverage in their international negotiations and this leverage is effective even when states negotiate with unelected bureaucrats during times of economic crisis.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Organization Vol.68, No.3; Sum.2014: p.701-720
Journal SourceInternational Organization Vol.68, No.3; Sum.2014: p.701-720
Key WordsInternational Negotiations ;  National Elections ;  Democracy ;  Politics ;  International Monetary Fund - IMF ;  Austerity Measures ;  Economic Crisis


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text