| ID | 133400 |
| Title Proper | Parshall's "whoppers" examined |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bennett, Martin |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This was written in response to an article by Jon Parshall that appeared in the Spring 2010 Naval War College Review.1 When I first came across Parshall's article I was interested and even intrigued, but the more I read, the more apparent it became that his work was not sound. One element, I believe, that may have colored what otherwise might have been an objective analysis was Parshall's clearly stated goal to "bury Fuchida." Generally, a biased, set conclusion is not a good starting point for a historical analysis. Good research begins with questions and ends with conclusions, when facts permit. Parshall attempts to make the facts fit his conclusions, and when he cannot, he uses conjecture and assumptions to try to bridge the gap. Throughout his article, Parshall employs a wide variety of euphemisms accusing Fuchida of "lies." One would expect a less snarky, cynical analysis from a historian. |
| `In' analytical Note | Naval War College Review Vol.66, No.1; Win.2013: p.110-125 |
| Journal Source | Naval War College Review Vol.66, No.1; Win.2013: p.110-125 |
| Key Words | Cynical Analysis ; Historical Concern ; Naval War ; Warfare History ; United States - US ; US Navy - USN |