| ID | 133973 |
| Title Proper | From watchdog to workhorse |
| Other Title Information | explaining the emergence of the ICC's burden-sharing policy as an example of creeping cosmopolitanism |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | McAuliffe, Padraig |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Though it was initially presumed that the primary role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) would be a residual one of monitoring and ensuring the fulfilment by the State of its obligations under the Rome Statute, it has over time moved towards a more activist "burden-sharing" role. Here, the Office of the Prosecutor initiates prosecutions of the leaders who bear the most responsibility for the most egregious crimes and encourages national prosecutions for the lower-ranking perpetrators. Since at least 2006, the Prosecutor has committed to a formal policy of inviting and welcoming voluntary referrals as a first step in triggering the jurisdiction of the Court. The judges on the Court have approved these referrals, while the broader academic and activist communities welcomed this more vertical relationship with national jurisdictions and, significantly, have provided the intellectual justifications for it. Burden-sharing, a concept unmentioned at the Rome Conference establishing the ICC, is presented as an unproblematic, natural and organic emanation from the Statute. This article argues that this development was not in fact inevitable or mandated by the Rome Statute. It was chosen, and in justifying this choice, familiar modes of cosmopolitan-constitutionalist treaty interpretation fundamentally premised on the field's virtue and indispensability have operated to enable a Court established as a residual watchdog to become a workhorse in individual situations by assuming the preponderance of responsibility for combating impunity. |
| `In' analytical Note | Chinese Journal of International Law Vol.13, No.2; Jun.2014: p.259-296 |
| Journal Source | Chinese Journal of International Law Vol.13, No.2; Jun.2014: p.259-296 |
| Key Words | International Criminal Court - ICC ; Cosmopolitanism ; Encourages National Prosecutions - ENP ; Organic Emanation ; National Jurisdictions ; Intellectual Justifications ; Cosmopolitan Community ; Substantial Autonomy ; Law and Justice ; International Law ; Formal Policy |