| ID | 133994 |
| Title Proper | Russia |
| Other Title Information | shifting political frontiers |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kuchinsky, George |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Russia's current system of government is weakening. Putin's annexation of Crimea only masks this underlying trend. The system remains centered around Putin. Putin has effectively eliminated individual and institutional political rivals. But public criticism has become more diffuse and hard to neutralize. The impact of public opinion on driving the political process is growing and the opposition is expanding and coalescing. This is manifested through multifaceted forms of dissent and the growing influence of opposition leader Aleksey Navalniy. The dissent, which was initially fueled by prominent opinion makers, evolved into sporadic protests in key urban centers and political campaigns. Why did people who used to support Putin or were apathetic become critical to the point of speaking out and even engaging in opposition activity? The most likely catalyst was the 2008-2009 financial crisis. It undermined Putin's longstanding argument that an authoritarian system, with him at the helm, was necessary for economic advancement. Beyond economics alone, resentment is driven more generally by state incapacity-incapacity to strengthen the social safety net, improve public services, and effectively address corruption; violent crime; natural disasters; and terrorism-which increasingly contrasts Putin's stability narrative. Credible estimates and public perceptions indicate that corruption levels today exceed even those of the turbulent 1990's. Russia's leadership is known to be the key driver and beneficiary of this trend, which is also an important component that fuels discontent. The opposition has not organized into a political party and the government temporarily bolstered its popularity through outside intervention. This makes it hard for the opposition to dislodge Putin and for Putin to contain the opposition, which is creating an impasse. Russia is likely to be increasingly characterized by volatility-internally and on the international stage. This volatility positions the U.S. and the European Union to have greater influence on Russia but it's important for the West to understand how to take advantage of its already substantial leverage. |
| `In' analytical Note | Comparative Strategy Vol.33, No.3; Jul-Aug.2014: p.262-278 |
| Journal Source | Comparative Strategy Vol.33, No.3; Jul-Aug.2014: p.262-278 |
| Key Words | Russia ; Geopolitics - Russia ; Shifting Power ; Political Frontiers ; Russia - Ukraine ; Crimea Conflicts ; Political Rivals ; Putin Regimes ; Political Ambitions ; Political Violence ; Financial Crisis ; Authoritarian System ; International System ; International Relations - IR ; International Organization - IO ; Political Crisis ; Substantial Leverage ; Great Influence |