Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:853Hits:19994600Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID134153
Title ProperTemperature seasonality and violent conflict
Other Title Informationthe inconsistencies of a warming planet
LanguageENG
AuthorLandis, Steven T
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Current climate change research suggests that certain seasonal weather patterns will be extended and others attenuated as global temperature increases. This is important because seasonal temperature change affects both the scarcity of resources during certain times of the year and the overall mobility of people living in countries that have seasonality. Consequently, these seasonal changes have implications for the onset of violent conflict, particularly as it relates to distinguishing when, where, and how it is most likely to occur. This article evaluates the relationship between monthly temperature changes, civil war onset, and various, less-organized conflict events, offering theoretical expectations for how seasonal changes and climate aberrations are related to an increased risk of violence. The results show that prolonged periods of stable, warm weather are consistently associated with an increased risk of civil war onset and non-state conflict. These findings are best explained through the strategic viability mechanism of temperature change, which allows actors to resolve their collective action problems that are often associated with poor weather conditions, while simultaneously increasing their strategic and behavioral incentives for engaging in violent conflict. Warm weather generates more resources for rebel looting and permits predictability for coordinating troop movements and strategy development. These findings are particularly salient in areas of the world affected by strong seasonality, where prolonged extensions of warm weather conditions would be regarded as both peculiar and attractive for participating in violent action. Although these findings are notable, even under the most extreme climate change scenarios, the substantive effects for these relationships are comparatively minor relative to other well-known intrastate Conflict Covariates.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Peace Research Vol.51, No.5; Sep.2014: p.603-618
Journal SourceJournal of Peace Research Vol.51, No.5; Sep.2014: p.603-618
Key WordsCountry-Month ;  Seasonality ;  Strategic Viability ;  Temperature ;  Unit of Analysis ;  Violent ;  Conflict ;  Conflict Covariates ;  Climate Change