Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:434Hits:19885382Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID134221
Title ProperLesser of two evils
Other Title InformationIslamic law and the emergence of a broad agreement on Muslim participation in western political systems
LanguageENG
AuthorShavit, Uriya
Publication2014.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Through an analysis that focuses on wasati and salafi fatwas, but searches also beyond them, this article demonstrates the emergence of a broad agreement (albeit not a consensus) in Islamic jurisprudence on the permissibility of political participation in the West. This broad agreement is based primarily on jurists' evaluation, drawing on 'fiqh al-muwazanat' (the jurisprudence of balances) that, in some cases, participation brings more benefit (maslaha) than harm (mafsada). The article comparatively examines wasati and salafi approaches to politics and to Muslim minorities to explain why jurists who disagreed on other fundamental issues in the field of fiqh al-aqalliyyat al-Muslima (the religious law of Muslim minorities) reached similar (but not identical) conclusions on political participation. Based on this analysis, a revision of some prevailing categorizations of salafiyya is suggested. Deliberations by some salafis, jihadi-salafis and members of Hizb al-Tahrir who oppose political participation and their refutations of the justifications invoked by jurists who legitimized it are also examined.
`In' analytical NoteContemporary Islam Vol.8, No.3; Sep.2014: p.239-259
Journal SourceContemporary Islam Vol.8, No.3; Sep.2014: p.239-259
Key WordsDemocracy ;  Electoral Politics ;  Muslims in the West ;  Wasatiyya ;  Salafiyya ;  Hizb Al-Tahrir ;  Fiqh Al-Aqalliyyat Al-Muslima ;  Maslaha ;  Ethnic Groups ;  Western Politics ;  Western Political Systems - WPS ;  Political System


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text