| ID | 134247 |
| Title Proper | Re-examining the Australian public's attitude to military casualties |
| Other Title Information | post-heroic or defeat-phobic? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Miller, Charles |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Australia, like most other developed democracies, is often alleged to suffer from ‘casualty phobia’. The perception that the Australian public will not tolerate casualties in foreign conflicts has shaped the decisions of both civilian and military policy makers. Measures taken to protect Australian forces from casualties may, for instance, also serve to increase the risk to civilians in the country to which they are deployed. The USA underwent a similar debate some years ago. Innovative public opinion research techniques—especially ‘survey experiments’ which allow researchers to establish causal relationships by consciously manipulating one variable while holding others constant—have established that the American public are not reflexively casualty-phobic and that the impact of casualties on public opinion can be outweighed by other factors, such as the public's confidence in the mission's overall success. In this article, the author replicates one of the key survey experiments from the US debate, suitably adapted to Australian conditions, with a nationally representative sample of Australian voters. The author finds that the same pattern holds in Australia as in the USA: casualties do lower public support for a given mission, but the mission's chances of success matter more. |
| `In' analytical Note | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol.68, No.5; Nov.2014: p.515-530 |
| Journal Source | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol: 68 No 5 |
| Standard Number | Defence Policy |