Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1393Hits:19829862Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID134336
Title ProperGrowing gap between facts and discourse on immigrant integration in the Netherlands
LanguageENG
AuthorEntzinger, Han
Summary / Abstract (Note)The Netherlands’ recent history of dealing with immigrant integration provides an excellent example of the dangers of thinking in terms of fixed ‘national’ integration models. When first confronted with large-scale immigration, the Netherlands embarked on a policy of multiculturalism. Its current approach is one of the most assimilationist in Western Europe: several in-between forms have also been tried out. This article describes the evolution of Dutch thinking and Dutch policy-making on immigrant integration over the past few decades, and it analyses why the country has switched so frequently from one model to another. The harsher approach of this moment can be explained neither by major shifts that might have occurred in public opinion, nor by the actual course of the immigrant integration process, which has been advancing steadily. The root causes of the growing gap between facts and discourse lie in popular anxiety provoked by profound changes in Dutch society.
`In' analytical NoteIdentities: Global Studies in Culture and Power vol. 21, No.6; Dec.2014: p.693-707
Journal SourceIdentities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 2014-12 21, 6
Key WordsMulticulturalism ;  Immigrants ;  Netherlands ;  Public Policy ;  Policy Making ;  Assimilation ;  Discourse ;  Integration Models ;  Dutch Society