Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:564Hits:19894783Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID134513
Title ProperPass the bucks
Other Title Informationcredit, blame, and the global competition for investment
LanguageENG
AuthorJensen, Nathan M
Summary / Abstract (Note)Both countries and subnational governments commonly engage in competition for mobile capital, offering generous incentives to attract investment. Existing economics research has suggested that these tax incentives have a limited ability to affect investment patterns and are often excessively costly when measured against the amount of investment and jobs created. In this paper, we argue instead that the “competition” for capital can be politically beneficial to incumbent politicians. Building off work on electoral pandering, we argue that incentives allow politicians to take credit for firms' investment decisions. We test the empirical implications of this theory using a nationwide Internet survey, which employs a randomized experiment to test how voters evaluate the performance of incumbent US governors. Our findings illustrate a critical political benefit of offering such incentives. Politicians can use these incentives to take credit for investment flowing into their districts and to minimize the political fallout when investors choose to locate elsewhere.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol.58, No.3; Sep.2014: p.433-447
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol: 58 No 3
Standard NumberEconomic Policy


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text