Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1228Hits:19654800Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID135247
Title ProperGlobal governance efforts in tension between humanitarian concerns and statist sovereignty rights
LanguageENG
AuthorWisotzki, Simone ;  Hofmann, Gregor P
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article focuses on the role of justice claims for issues of global governance. Conflicting justice convictions held by states can become considerable stumbling blocks for multilateral negotiations. Normative claims which call for strengthening individual rights, such as human rights or human security, often collide with statist sovereignty convictions, such as the right of non-intervention, territorial integrity and non-interference. Conflicts between negotiating parties also occur on questions of distribution, recognition and procedural justice. The article argues that such justice conflicts affect the outcome of negotiations. Two recent negotiation processes and governance efforts at the United Nations are examined: the Responsibility to Protect (2005) and the Arms Trade Treaty (2013).
`In' analytical NoteInternational Negotiation Vol.19, No.3; 2014: p.487-517
Journal SourceInternational Negotiation Vol: 19 No 3
Key WordsHumanitarianism ;  Global Governance ;  Negotiations ;  Justice ;  Multilateral Negotiation ;  Norms ;  Fairness ;  Responsibility to Protect ;  Arms Trade Treaty ;  United Nations ;  Conflict Affects


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text