| ID | 135294 |
| Title Proper | Domestic legitimacy politics and varieties of regionalism in East Asia |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Park, Seo-Hyun ; Cho, Hyun |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | What drives East Asian regionalism? The rise of China and the perceived decline in the influence of the United States have sparked debates about the future of the regional order, including the yet-unresolved question of whose leadership is likely to be more stable and accepted as legitimate by other regional actors. What is puzzling, however, is that persistent demands for the formation of a coherent and uniquely East Asian regional institution have come not from China or the US, as is the focus of existing studies, but rather Japan and South Korea. In this article, we propose an alternative framework that conceptualises the varieties of East Asian regionalism, emphasising the multiple pivots and variegated levels of politics involved in efforts toward regional cooperation. We find that competing proposals for East Asian regionalism since the 1990s are not determined by structural pressures or the convergence of interests but rather result from domestic legitimacy politics. Japanese and Korean leaders have, at different time periods, proposed their own alternative region-making initiatives appealing to domestically contested views on how best to seek autonomy from the region's Great Powers as a way to enhance their political standing domestically and regionally. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol.40, No.3; Jul.2014: p.583-606 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol: 40 No 3 |
| Standard Number | United States – US |