Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:392Hits:19943312Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID136095
Title ProperWomen speaking of national security
Other Title Informationthe case of checkpoint watch
LanguageENG
AuthorAmir, Merav
Summary / Abstract (Note)The production of reports and the distribution of information have become integral to the operation of many non-governmental organizations. In this regard, the fact that the all-women organization of Checkpoint Watch publishes reports about the Israeli checkpoints in the occupied West Bank seems to comply with current trends. However, the reports—most of which are short repetitive descriptions of the banality and everydayness of the military checkpoints, counting the number of people and cars waiting, commenting on the manner in which the checks are performed and meticulously documenting what mostly amounts to minor incidents of humiliation and distress—do not seem to abide by any convention of reporting. This work analyzes the reporting praxis of the organization and claims that it should be understood as a form of activism in and of itself. Tracking the ways in which the reports address the Israeli public through the concept of parrhesia, the work suggests that this form of reporting enables the women activists to use their gendered marginality to make their way into the highly masculinized and militarized Israeli security discourse.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Political Sociology Vol.8, No.4; Dec.2014: p.363-378
Journal SourceCivil Wars Vol: 16 No 3
Standard NumberNational Security