| ID | 137048 |
| Title Proper | Securitization of democracy |
| Other Title Information | freedom house ratings of Russia |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Parker, David ; Tsygankov, Andrei P |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article explores the claims of Russian officials that US assessments of economic and political developments in Russia, particularly those of Freedom House (FH), are excessively critical and often used to justify global dominance. To assess the validity of such claims, three different influences are considered: culture, power, and special interests. The article finds that all three, each with roots in the cold war, play a role in shaping assessments of Russia and help to explain why FH's analysis of Russia is more critical than the analysis of other organizations. The politics of special interests is found to be particularly influential and reflects the interests of US national security policies and priorities. Such priorities are also linked to a politics of memory derived from the cold war, which often influences perceptions of Russia as a threat rather than as a potential partner. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Security Vol.24, No.1; Mar.2015: p.77-100 |
| Journal Source | European Security Vol: 24 No 1 |
| Standard Number | National Security |