ID | 137085 |
Title Proper | Constructing new environments versus attitude adjustment |
Other Title Information | contrasting the substance of democracy in UN and EU democracy promotion discourses |
Language | ENG |
Author | Schmidt, Jessica |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | In contrasting UN with EU democracy promotion discourses, the article contributes to the debate on the substance of EU democracy promotion by approaching the question of ‘democratic substance’ from the vantage point of sovereignty. For its analytical framing, it draws on relevant aspects of Foucault's work on power. The article suggests that, due to their diverging obligations to sovereignty, the substance of democracy promotion in UN discourses revolves around an institutional-centric understanding, whereas in EU discourses we see a significant reconceptualization of democracy as a norms-based concept. The latter does not aim at the government of society but the ethical self-governance of socially embedded individuals. It is argued that, with the decreasing purchase of democracy as a universal political project and the growing concern with local contexts, the EU's norms-based conception emerges as better equipped to adapt to contemporary challenges of governing. The article concludes with raising some doubts about the democratic promise and potential of the democratic rationality underpinning EU discourses. Democracy, participation and political change are no longer conceived in terms of shaping and influencing public agenda but refer to socially shaping and influencing subjective perceptions and behaviours. |
`In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol.28, No.1; Mar.2015: p.35-54 |
Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 28 No 1 |
Standard Number | Democracy |