Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:683Hits:20085286Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID137400
Title ProperCash or combat? America’s Asian alliances during the war in Afghanistan
LanguageENG
AuthorHlatky, Stefanie Von ;  Darden, Jessica Trisko
Summary / Abstract (Note)A basic trade-off in military cooperation exists: States must respond to the dominant ally’s demands and act as a reliable partner while simultaneously making a decision that is acceptable to domestic audiences. We argue that compensatory burden-sharing strategies are imperfect but dependable solutions to manage foreign policy decisions at the domestic and alliance levels. Our theoretical expectations are tested using the US-Japan and US-Republic of Korea alliances and, in particular, the contribution of each country to the war in Afghanistan. We find that foreign aid commitments to third parties are made as a form of compensation when alliance expectations are substantial, but the secondary ally's ability to contribute militarily is highly constrained. Foreign aid has therefore served as an alliance management tool.
`In' analytical NoteAsian Security Vol. 11, No.1; Jan-Apr 2015: p.31-51
Journal SourceAsian Security Vol: 11 No 1
Standard NumberAfghanistan


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text